A mortgage adviser has been stripped of all his regulated permissions by the FSA.
Christopher Riches, trading as Fairway Mortgages, of Hornchurch, Essex, had continued to advise clients despite not being regulated, and lied about having professional indemnity insurance.
The FSA says that Riches was granted authorisation by the FSA to conduct regulated home finance business in October 2004, and in January 2005 was also permitted to conduct insurance mediation business. However, in January 2010, he was required to cease to conduct regulated business.
Nevertheless, he had completed 69 mortgage transactions since then.
The regulator also found that Riches had submitted false and misleading information to it, including three Regulated Mediation Activities Returns in which he stated he had PI insurance, when in fact he did not.
In a supervisory notice the FSA said: “Mr Riches has conducted regulated activities despite not having the permission to do so over a prolonged period of time, and therefore has failed to conduct his business with honesty and integrity, or in compliance with proper standards, and he therefore no longer satisfies the FSA that he is a fit and proper person to conduct regulated activities.
“He has repeatedly provided false and misleading information to the FSA, and as such Mr Riches presents a significant risk to consumers.”
Riches has the right to refer the matter to the Upper Tribunal.
NEWS source: Introducer Today
Christopher Riches, trading as Fairway Mortgages, of Hornchurch, Essex, had continued to advise clients despite not being regulated, and lied about having professional indemnity insurance.
The FSA says that Riches was granted authorisation by the FSA to conduct regulated home finance business in October 2004, and in January 2005 was also permitted to conduct insurance mediation business. However, in January 2010, he was required to cease to conduct regulated business.
Nevertheless, he had completed 69 mortgage transactions since then.
The regulator also found that Riches had submitted false and misleading information to it, including three Regulated Mediation Activities Returns in which he stated he had PI insurance, when in fact he did not.
In a supervisory notice the FSA said: “Mr Riches has conducted regulated activities despite not having the permission to do so over a prolonged period of time, and therefore has failed to conduct his business with honesty and integrity, or in compliance with proper standards, and he therefore no longer satisfies the FSA that he is a fit and proper person to conduct regulated activities.
“He has repeatedly provided false and misleading information to the FSA, and as such Mr Riches presents a significant risk to consumers.”
Riches has the right to refer the matter to the Upper Tribunal.
NEWS source: Introducer Today